According to the latest Kaspersky study, 46% of geo-distributed businesses surveyed in South Africa identified a disparity between the levels of cyber protection across all sites: 30% of these companies admitted this problem but didn't think it was critical, the remaining 16% stated their branches required much more cybersecurity measures to be implemented. However, Kaspersky’s experts are warning multi-site businesses that such a disparity can endanger the whole organisation.
he recent Kaspersky report ‘Managing geographically distributed businesses: Challenges and solutions’ provides a deeper insight into the network and information security challenges faced by geo-distributed companies and highlights solutions organisations employ to overcome these difficulties. Kaspersky’s survey covered Network and Information Security decision makers from 20 countries worldwide.
According to this report, 54% of respondents in South Africa were confident that the protection from cyberthreats in their head office (HQ) was equally effective as in local offices. 46% stated that there was a disparity between these levels of cybersecurity: 30% of them believed that the problem existed but it was not so critical, they said most of local offices were generally well-protected, 16% were not so enthusiastic and supposed that only some/a few of the branches were under control.
In addition to budgetary constraints, one of the reasons for
such a disparity lies in the lack of trust with the local expertise. In 26% of
cases in South Africa, head offices took responsibility for all cybersecurity
activities in the branches, stating that local staff didn't have sufficient
knowledge and qualifications. Even in 72% of instances when cybersecurity tasks
were shared equally between HQ and local teams, all the activities were
supervised by head office. In 2% of cases, all monitoring is done by local
teams.
"Although the most sensitive data may be held centrally, access to the company’s assets is clearly required from several locations, and when they are not as well protected as head office, it creates security risks for the whole organisation. Perhaps, there is a misconception that a lower level of protection will suffice for sites that play a secondary role in the company’s structure. However, cybercriminals don’t care which place gets attacked – be it head office or its branches – they can penetrate the company’s infrastructure from any location. Therefore, it’s important to enable protection that is equally effective at all sites," comments Anton Solovey, Senior Product Manager (XDR) at Kaspersky.
To protect geo-distributed companies from cyber threats, Kaspersky experts recommend employing centralised and automated solutions such as Kaspersky Next XDR Expert to ensure comprehensive cyber protection of all company assets and processes both at HQ and local offices. By aggregating and correlating data from multiple sources in one place and leveraging machine learning technologies, this solution provides effective threat detection and rapid automated response.
The full report with more findings on the challenges facing geo-distributed companies is available via this link.
